![]() ![]() The thing is, the moon landing footage didn’t look real because Kubrick filmed it-Kubrick’s movie 2001 looked real because Kubrick enlisted astronomical artists and aerospace engineers to help him with it. It was so compelling that some conspiracy theorists later wondered if the government had actually hired Kubrick to film the moon landing in a soundstage (possibly like the one James Bond ran through in the 1971 film Diamonds Are Forever). The moon landing is fake because the shadows aren’t right.ĭirector Stanley Kubrick’s film 2001: A Space Odyssey wowed audiences in 1968 for creating a realistic image of outer space. Even though you can see the stars from where you’re standing, a quick-exposure camera won’t be able to capture them. The same thing happens if you go onto someone’s back porch at night and turn on the lights. The exposure on the astronauts’ cameras was too short to capture the space suits and the moon’s surface while also capturing the comparatively dimmer stars. And the astronauts are wearing bright white space suits that are highly reflective.” “All of the exposures of the astronauts on the moon are daylight exposures,” he explains. But if you’ve ever used a camera before, it’s easy to understand why. Or rather, there are no stars in the pictures that Armstrong and Aldrin took on the moon. “One of the first arguments I heard and one of the easiest to debunk…is the fact that there are no stars in the lunar sky,” Fienberg says. He has just deployed the Early Apollo Scientific Experiments Package (EASEP) where you can see the Passive Seismic Experiment Package, the Laser Ranging Retro-Reflector and the Lunar Module "Eagle". The moon landing is fake because you can’t see the stars.Īldrin during the Apollo 11 extravehicular activity on the Moon. After the astronauts step away, it stays in the same bent shape because of the partially-extended rod. In video images of the flag, you can see it only moves while the astronauts are grinding it into the moon’s surface. The Apollo 11 astronauts had trouble extending the rod all the way, and in still pictures, this creates a ripple effect that makes the flag look like it’s waving in the wind. These flags had a horizontal rod inside to make them stick out from the flagpole. This wouldn’t make for a very appealing photo, so NASA designed special flags for astronauts to take with them ( all six Apollo missions that made it to the moon planted an American flag there). If the astronauts had planted a regular flag on the moon, it would’ve hung slack like flags do on Earth when there’s no wind. That’s because it isn’t an ordinary flag. The simple answer is, it isn’t flapping, Fienberg says. But how can that be, since there’s no wind on the moon? If you look at the American flag in still pictures from the Apollo 11 mission, it appears to be flapping in the wind. The moon landing is fake because the American flag looks like it is flapping in the wind.īuzz Aldrin with the American flag on the moon in 1969. Here, we break down some of the most enduring conspiracy theories about the moon landing-and why there’s no evidence to support them. “If in fact the main motivation for believing in the moon hoax that is you don’t trust the government, you don’t trust our leaders, you don’t trust authority, how can you feel that 400,000 people would keep their mouths shut for 50 years? It’s just implausible.” “About 400,000 scientists, engineers, technologists, machinists, electricians, worked on the Apollo program,” Fienberg points out. But faking the success of the Apollo 11 mission would require deception on a grand scale-and would be practically impossible to pull off, says Fienberg. The initial claims the moon landing was staged came at a time when the Pentagon Papers and Watergate had eroded Americans’ trust in their government. He has some first-hand knowledge of this: nearly 40 years ago, Fienberg debated one of the first prominent moon landing deniers, Bill Kaysing, on TV. “With few exceptions, the same arguments just keep coming up over and over again,” says Rick Fienberg, the press officer for the American Astronomical Society, who holds a PhD in astronomy. Most of the deniers' “proof” is based on perceived anomalies in the images transmitted back to Earth from the moon's lunar surface. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |